A remote hardware diagnostic and a blacklist check, run on the seller’s own phone, turned into a signed certificate the marketplace or insurer can act on. No lab, no postage, no waiting.
Two routes through the same diagnostic. Pick the one that brought you here.
Two lanes, two payers — and in neither of them does the consumer face a card form.
The compliance risk sits with the venue, not the seller: it’s the marketplace that carries the regulatory exposure, the returns cost and the stolen-goods problem. It’s also one contract and one invoice instead of millions of card payments — no payment handling, refunds or chargebacks on our side.
This runs at the point of sale, not at claim. The insurer diverts the applicant to us, and gets back an eligibility answer plus a timestamped record of exactly what was already wrong with the device the moment cover began. Pre-existing damage re-presented later as a fresh accident is the largest leakage in device insurance, and it is unanswerable without that record.
The current answer is photographs. Several insurers already ask applicants to photograph the device at quote — which is an admission that the problem is real, and a weak remedy for it. A photo shows one face of a handset, in lighting the applicant chose, at a moment they chose. It cannot report battery health, it cannot read an IMEI, and it cannot be checked against the stolen registry. A diagnostic does all three, and signs the result.
Why not charge the consumer directly: a fee in front of a listing is friction at the exact moment the seller is deciding whether to bother, and it creates the wrong incentive — a seller who paid for a fail will retest until it passes. Paying us per verification keeps issuance, and therefore quality control, with the party who wants the compliance.